🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.